Start Here + OSAMR
Fix the scaffold without lowering the thinking.
Choose a group page, identify what went wrong with the original AI request, redesign the support, test your redesign in Gemini, and post a clear before/after fix to Padlet.
What you will do
- 1
Diagnose
Name the access barrier and what the AI accidentally took over.
- 2
Redesign
Write a better AI request or scaffold that supports students without giving away the thinking.
- 3
Test + post
Use Gemini as a coach, revise your support, then post your before/after fix to Padlet.
Core test
Barrier removed. Thinking preserved. Target unchanged.
A strong fix changes the support, not the learning target or success criteria.
Simple OSAMR Guide
Use this as a quick reference. The goal is not always the highest level; the goal is the right level for the learning target.
S
Substitution
Same task. AI replaces a tool.
A
Augmentation
Same task. AI adds useful support.
M
Modification
Task is redesigned, but the target stays intact.
R
Redefinition
AI enables a new learning move students could not easily do before.
O
Overreliance
AI does the thinking, answer, evidence, or product for students.
Padlet link
Use this after your group completes the final after-Gemini fix.
Open Padlet ↗
Model
What counts as a strong fix?
A strong fix rewrites the AI request so the support helps students access the task without doing the task for them.
Go to group pages
Problematic AI input
The original request sounded helpful, but it asked AI to do the core student thinking.
Bad prompt
Summarize this article for 7th graders and tell students the author’s central claim and two pieces of evidence they should use in their response.
Why this is a problem: AI gives the claim and evidence. Students can answer without reading closely, selecting evidence, or explaining the connection.
Fixed AI input
The revised request keeps AI in a support role and leaves the reading/evidence work with students.
Better prompt
Create an access scaffold for students reading a challenging article. Do not summarize the article, name the central claim, or choose evidence for students. Instead, create:
1. chunk headings,
2. 5 student-friendly vocabulary supports,
3. one focus question per chunk, and
4. a blank evidence organizer that requires students to return to the original article and choose their own evidence.
Why this works: AI removes language and organization barriers, but students still read, identify the claim, select evidence, and explain how the evidence supports the claim.
Design rule: Ask AI for scaffolds, questions, vocabulary, structure, and checks — not the answer, claim, evidence, reasoning, model, or completed organizer.